Proposed Constitutional Change in Congo Sparks Controversy
In a striking reversal of fortunes, the Common Front for Congo (FCC), spearheaded by Joseph Kabila, has denounced the proposed constitutional amendment as a “declaration of war” on the Congolese populace. In a press release dated 27 October 2024, the FCC advanced the argument that the proposed constitutional changes, as outlined by President Félix Tshisekedi, would have a detrimental impact on the nation’s stability.
What’s at Stake?
The FCC has identified a potential ulterior motive behind this constitutional alteration, namely the establishment of an omnipotent presidency for life. The proposed changes could potentially result in the dismantling of existing constitutional provisions concerning presidential terms and the dilution of the powers of provinces and decentralised entities. Raymond Tshibanda, in a press release, stated that if the proposal passes, it will strip all institutions of their legitimacy, paving the way for chaos. He further stated that it is a declaration of war by President Tshisekedi on the Congolese people.
A Call to Action
The FCC is encouraging the Congolese people to oppose this proposal. “Agreeing to this would be akin to disrespecting the memory of our heroes,” the statement emphasises. History demonstrates that the Congolese people have consistently demonstrated their willingness to defend their rights, whether in 1959, 1992, 1997, or 1998. The FCC is confident that the people will once again unite to safeguard their freedom and sovereignty.
The 2006 Constitution: A Proud Congolese Achievement
The FCC maintains that the 2006 Constitution was the result of Congolese efforts and not the product of foreign influence. Joseph Kabila’s platform supports this assertion with a number of points:
1. The Senate Commission, which proposed the new Constitution, was chaired by the late Senator Bruno Mbiango, a highly regarded Congolese jurist.
2. The commission comprised a number of senators and experts in constitutional law, all of whom were Congolese.
3. Prior to drafting the new Constitution, the Senate conducted a comprehensive consultation process across all provinces to gather public opinion.
4. The draft Constitution was duly adopted by the Senate and subsequently by the National Assembly following a comprehensive review process.
5. The final draft was submitted to a referendum and subsequently promulgated by the President, thereby reflecting the will of the primary sovereign.
The FCC has stated that this is not simply a document; it is a testament to our sovereignty and a symbol of our collective will.
As the political situation continues to evolve, it is natural to have questions. Is this a genuine effort to modernise governance, or is it merely a power play? Only time will reveal the answer. Until further notice, the Congolese people will maintain a state of vigilance, prepared to defend their democratic heritage.
Joram Jojo